September 3, 2008
(To our readers: This is a 3-week issue of CHALLENGE)
U.S.-RUSSIA FIGHT
SHARPENS . . .OIL FUELS GEORGIA WAR
Russian and U.S.-backed Georgian forces have
killed thousands of civilians as they battle for oil routes and political
dominance in the republic of Georgia that was part of the southern region of the
former Soviet Union. (Georgia broke away from Russia after 1991.) Fighting began
on August 8 when Georgia launched an offensive to regain control of the South
Ossetia region from pro-Russian separatists. Moscow responded by sending in
troops and tanks and shelling cities.
“War started today,” Russian
premier Putin boasted to George Bush at the Beijing Olympics (Bloomberg,
8/08/08). Bush, leader of “the world’s sole superpower,” could
only mutter feebly about “supporting Georgia’s territorial
integrity.” A day later, 4,000 Russian troops landed in Abkhazia, another
breakaway Georgian province. Russia’s Black Sea fleet steamed to the
Georgian coast threatening a blockade.
RUSSIA COULD GRAB MAJOR
U.S. PIPELINE
Putin’s moves in Georgia endanger the
centerpiece of U.S. rulers’ efforts to counter Russia’s expanding
energy-based imperialism. The new U.S.- and British-financed Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
(BTC) oil pipeline, one of the world’s largest, runs through Georgia,
skirting South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Opened in 2006, operated by British
Petroleum, and owned partly by Chevron, it carries more than one million barrels
of Caspian crude per day to Western Europe and the U.S. through the Turkish port
of Ceyhan on the Mediterrean (see map).
Strategists in the Clinton administration
chose the BTC route in order to bypass Russia and Iran. Its Ceyhan terminus sits
conveniently close to the U.S. Air Force’s vast base at Incirlik, Turkey.
But the U.S. has nevertheless proven supremely incapable of protecting its BTC
lifeline. Russian troops reportedly fired on it in Georgia. And Kurdish rebels
in Turkey had shut it down temporarily a week before by setting it on
fire.
GEORGIA’S EMBATTLED PRESIDENT TOOL OF LIBERAL
U.S. BOSSES
The fighting in Georgia is one for control of
the world’s energy resources. U.S. rulers’ struggle to control
Georgia is aimed at preventing their Russian rivals from replacing the U.S. as
the world’s main energy controller. But oil and gas are only part —
though a very big part — of an even larger conflict between U.S. and
Russian rulers over political and military control of the former Soviet nations
now outside Russia.
Expanding NATO throughout the former Soviet
bloc and installing a shield of nuclear missiles there, aimed at Russia as well
as at Iran, are vital U.S. goals. But ever since they boosted the anti-Soviet
“Solidarity” movement in Poland in the 1980s, U.S. rulers, lacking a
military home field advantage, have focused on buying elections in the
region.
Billionaire swindler and Rockefeller ally
George Soros has led the charge, bankrolling anti-Russian, pro-U.S. “color
revolutions” in the old Soviet sphere. Its aim was to oust pro-Russian
governments in Georgia (its banner was Rose) and in the Ukraine (Orange). Soros
helped engineer Mikhail Saakashvili’s 2003 defeat of Georgian president
and ex-Soviet Politburo member Eduard Shevardnadze. “It’s generally
accepted public opinion here that Mr. Soros is the person who planned
Shevardnadze’s overthrow,” the Toronto Globe and Mail said at the
time (11/26/03). The Kremlin responded to these U.S. “victories” by
curtailing gas supplies to Ukraine and Georgia, which hastened the present
crisis.
The U.S. liberal establishment molded
Saakashvili. He graduated from Columbia Law School and practiced at the
prestigious Wall Street firm Patterson Belknap, which counts the Rockefeller
Foundation as a top client. Soros personally presented Saakashvili with his Open
Society Award. Consequently, Georgia under Saakashvili proved a staunch U.S.
ally, until the Russian onslaught. Georgia just recalled 1,000 troops it had
aiding the U.S. in Iraq back to its new home fronts.
NEXT PRESIDENT WILL HAVE TO
RESTORE DRAFT
U.S. rulers understand that two-bit proxies
like Georgia can’t ultimately prevail in global conflicts with rising
powers like Russia (or China). And with the shortcomings of their present
“volunteer” military — who enlisted mostly because of economic
hardship — U.S. rulers won’t be able to intervene to protect their
interests. Therefore, they will need a draft, which will likely begin in the
form of a “National Service,” part of which will lead especially
working-class youth into the military.
A May 5 report issued jointly by the liberal
Brookings Institution and the Army War College concluded that the “impact
of fighting long wars using an all-volunteer force needs to be looked at more
closely.” Both Obama and McCain will restore a “National
Service” draft because, if they don’t, they will be as powerless
against emerging imperialist rivals as is Bush.
Desperate for wider wars, U.S. rulers bombard
the youth they will soon draft with dead-end, pro-capitalist patriotism. Russian
bosses use Nazi-like nationalism, while Georgian misleaders count on meaningless
racism and“ethnicity.” It’s all a trap. The only way out of
the profit system’s endless wars is a mass communist-led revolution of the
working class. This is Progressive Labor Party’s goal.
LA Summer Project
Builds Communist Leadership for Future
Over 100 international workers, soldiers and
students participated in our Summer Project here with the goal of strengthening
our organizing efforts amongst industrial workers and soldiers. We have
distributed over 8,000 CHALLENGES and over 15,000 leaflets in the past three
weeks at factories, transit divisions, hospitals, schools and military bases.
Our communist message was enthusiastically welcomed and over 50 people gave us
their contact information to get involved.
The Project specifically focused on the
opportunity that exists to organize workers in the concentration of
subcontracted aerospace shops found in southern California. These non-union,
mainly immigrant, workers play an important role in war production and for this
reason must play an important role in the long-term struggle for workers’
state power. Industrial workers and soldiers are central both to capitalism and
to the fight to destroy it and build communism, workers’
rule.
Summer Project volunteers met workers from a
garment shop where the Party has maintained ties for many years. We asked about
the conditions in the factory. The workers questioned the volunteers about the
kinds of class struggle they organized back home in the places where they
worked. The workers eagerly provided specific details about conditions in the
plant including a recent work stoppage on the factory floor. The years of
friendship, and the distribution of CHALLENGE, with these workers laid the basis
for this vigorous discussion.
As a result a communist leaflet was produced
and passed out at the factory. As the volunteers distributed the literature an
angry boss came out to snatch it from us. One taller worker, who just received
literature, held his CHALLENGE and leaflet high so his boss could not grab them.
This young leader inspired us all to distribute more literature. In learning
from the working class we are also having a concrete effect on our class
brothers and sisters by influencing the class struggle, on a modest but
significant level, with communist politics.
Another key aspect of the Project was to
start building the worker-student-soldier alliance. At LA colleges and high
schools we passed out a leaflet that linked police brutality to the nature of
capitalist exploitation in the factories. At one high school, a parent
approached and asked what we were distributing. The comrade gave the parent a
leaflet and a CHALLENGE. They discussed the problems of elections, then the
police, and how they are systematically used to terrorize black and Latino
youth. The parent was enthusiastic about our presence and encouraged us to
return. At the same high school, a student who got the paper then asked for five
more to distribute to his friends and gave us his contact information.
Students Discuss Communist
Revolution with U.S. Marines
Our visit to a Marine base in California was
preceded by political discussion within the Project about the true nature of the
lives of soldiers in the bosses’ military. More experienced comrades
shared their experiences in working on military bases in order for the younger
comrades to feel confident when distributing CHALLENGE to soldiers and marines.
Engaging marines in conversations about the role they can play in turning the
guns around on the capitalist system, not workers of other nations, and fighting
for working-class power instead of imperialism, was a valuable learning
experience.
Project volunteers found that many marines do
not agree with the U.S. imperialist agenda in the Middle East. The majority of
these young marines come from the working class and joined the Marine Corps
because they needed a job. Despite the bosses’ intense ideological effort
throughout their military training to win these working-class youth to racist,
fascist ideas, many soldiers we met were not only open but eager to discuss
communist revolution. Five of them gave us their contact information and want to
keep in touch. Many thanked us for being there. One young marine came to have
lunch with us. We got a better response to CHALLENGE and to GI Notes than
we’ve gotten here before. The response shows that we need to do this much
more often.
Investing in a
Communist Future
Young comrades provided communist leadership
in all aspects of this Summer Project. Bridging language barriers, students and
workers discussed that students come from the working class and unity between
students and workers is important to building the communist movement. A group of
new comrades described their participation in a community organization that
focuses on education. Collectively we discussed the contradiction between reform
and revolution and how they can fight to strengthen the revolutionary communist
side of that contradiction in the community organization.
The Summer Project has
shown
the potential and openness of workers
to communist politics in the face of the bosses’ proclaiming it dead.
Whether Obama or McCain is elected the intensifying rivalry between imperialists
and widening wars means more attacks on workers in the form of an increase of
police terror and exploitation at the workplace. These sharpening conditions
make workers, students, and soldiers open to talking about alternatives to
capitalism. The Project inspired all who participated to return home committed
to increase their own organizing of class struggle on the job. Our goal is to
turn our Summer Project experiences into a lifetime commitment to serving our
class.
Veteran PL
Farmworker’s Inspiring Stories of Battles in the
Fields
LOS ANGELES, CA, August 9 ––
After another day of CHALLENGE sales, house visits, and study groups, L.A.
Summer Project volunteers took a trip through history when one of the main PL
organizers of the migrant worker struggles, Epifanio Camacho, hosted a
“carne asada” (BBQ). With the smell of collectively-prepared
barbeque in the background and under a large shade tree, PLP volunteers squeezed
into Camacho’s yard, many unsure of what to expect.
Camacho began speaking of the political work
in Delano of organizing workers, comparing it to birds spreading seeds. In
Delano, often workers from Mexico would learn communist politics and then return
home where the lessons and politics they learned could one day bear fruit. This
is one way that communism spreads around the world. Camacho fielded questions
from PL youth and former Delano Project participants alike, opening up
discussions that are still echoing through the Summer Project
Camacho spoke about his experiences working
with Cesar Chavez, the misleader of the United Farm Workers Union. When asked if
he thought Chavez, who would regularly turn workers over to immigration officers
and make deals with bosses behind the workers backs, should be given a holiday,
he instantly said, “Hell no!” He told stories of how Chavez went on
a hunger strike to stop violence against scabs (the bosses canonized him in the
media). Later Camacho told how he and the workers of his town organized a
demonstration against the fascist police who were terrorizing and killing
workers. The militant demonstration was held in the police station were the
workers threatened to burn the station down if they did not stop the fascist
attacks. This action chased out the cops –– almost 20 years ago
–– and they never came back. His stories were inspirational to
everyone.
Just like the work in Delano sent seeds of
communist thought through Mexico, so will the L.A. and Seattle Summer Project
participants spread the lessons we’re learning and the excitement
we’re building through CHALLENGE sales, study groups, and collective
living across the country when we return to our home cities.
(Camacho’s memoirs are on
PLP.org)
Aerospace Workers Need
United Strike vs.
Warmakers
WICHITA, KANSAS, Aug. 4 — Over 100
striking Machinists closed down the Hawker-Beechcraft plant here today with mass
pickets. Earlier, 4,700 workers in IAM (International Association of Machinists)
Local Lodge 733 (Wichita) and 500 in IAM Local Lodge 2328 (Salina, Ks.) voted
90% to reject the new contract and 89% to strike the same day — the first
strike since 1984.
Everyone’s wondering how this relates
to a possible strike early next month at Boeing because the issues are so
similar. Even IAM International President Buffenbarger had to acknowledge the
obvious: “It looks like workers are not going to take it anymore,”
he admitted. The “rolling thunder” — the militant deafening
banging every hour, on the hour — that has already started in the Boeing
plants indicates he may have got it right.
Like Boeing, Hawker wants to separate new
hires from veterans with cuts in earned time off, cuts in two job codes that
will affect new hires and hidden costs in medical benefits for new hires. A
veteran machinist Terri Holloway said: “If we don’t fight for the
new people, they’re going to get the old people next.”
None of this should come as a surprise as
Hawker was recently taken over — with the union’s blessing —
by Onyx (in partnership with Wall Street Investment bankers Goldman Sacks). Onyx
is the same outfit that grabbed Boeing’s Wichita plant and immediately cut
wages.
To add insult to injury, Hawker leaked a
secret plan to develop a final assembly plant in Chihuahua, Mexico. The threat
(and fact) of moving more work to low-wage areas in the U.S. and Mexico has
changed the face of aerospace. Narrow trade unionism has become a sick
joke.
Aerospace is crucial to the bosses’
imperialist ambitions. As challenges to U.S. rulers’ dominance mount daily
(witness Russia’s incursion into Georgia and China’s emergence
during the Olympics), the bosses are determined to reindustrialize on our backs.
War becomes the more likely option and we’re going to fund that war
machine with our lives and livelihoods. In 2001, the Pentagon called for
“competitive outsourcing” (Aerospace Daily, 2/3/2001). Now they want
to build a “southern aerospace corridor” — taking advantage of
low wages in Florida, Georgia, Mississippi and Alabama caused by years of racist
super-exploitation.
As expected the bosses’ servants in the
union mis-leadership wave the American flag. We, on the other hand, wave the red
flag of communist class-consciousness. Same enemy, same fight, workers of the
world unite!
Angry Homecare Workers
Must Sack Union Hacks, Bosses’ Politicians
NEW YORK, NY, Aug. 7th –– Eleven
thousand members of Local 1199 Service Employees International Union (SEIU)
Healthcare Workers East attended a rally at Madison Square Garden to support
30,000 homecare worker members in their struggle for upgrading pay and against
the growing threat to their medical benefits. Their contract expires
December 31. As PL’ers distributed all the CHALLENGES newspapers we had to
eager and angry workers, it was clear that the workers were ready to
fight.
The reasons for their anger were clear. Many
of the agencies that employ them are run for profit. They typically skim off
half of their state- and city-funded budgets for “administrative
expenses.” The average homecare worker, almost exclusively minority and
immigrant women, gets about $8/hour while providing lifesaving services.
(As CHALLENGE has pointed out before, these workers receive no extra pay for
overtime hours and less than their hourly pay when they stay
overnight.)
The system under which tens of thousands of
the elderly and infirm are cared for in this city makes it clear why we
must smash capitalism. The bosses’ system places little value on the lives
of those who no longer produce profits for them and therefore spends as little
as possible on their care.
Homecare workers have suffered racist
exploitation from their bosses and less than full support from the SEIU 1199
leadership. The union leaders refuse to unify them and prepare for a massive
strike. On the contrary, this rally was dominated by speech after speech from
politicians like Governor Patterson who is planning a $1 billion cut in the
state budget. Also featured were Senator Schumer and Congressman Weiner who are
busy urging war on Iran. Each of these politicians promote cutting
workers’ living standards to pay for U.S. imperialism’s economic and
war needs. SEIU leaders are lulling healthcare workers into believing we have no
power other than in our union’s political endorsements. In the face of
capitalism’s growing economic crisis and war in the oil-rich Middle East
and Caspian regions, this is deadly poison for the working class.
Progressive Labor Party and its paper,
CHALLENGE, must organize the working class to make a communist revolution. How
do we get there? By stepping up the struggle with bosses every day, not allying
with them, by getting involved in the daily problems faced by our
friends and co-workers, by reading and circulating CHALLENGE participating
in discussion groups, and joining the PLP to make egalitarian communism the
main issue of the day!
From California to
Seattle:
Volunteers
Help Connect Boeing Workers
LOS ANGELES — “I have the
paper,” said a Boeing worker as he drove from the parking lot, “but
I just wanted to stop and thank you for being here.”
During shift change at this plant that builds
military planes, students and teachers from the PLP Summer Project here
distributed 120 copies of CHALLENGE and 500 leaflets, a reprint of the CHALLENGE
article, “Bosses’ Imperialist Dogfight Sets Stage for Boeing
Contract Fight.”
Men and women, younger and older, black,
Latin, Asian and white workers took the literature. They were especially
interested in the article since it was written by Boeing workers in
Seattle.
Another worker exited his car to tell us that
the bosses in his section had called a meeting earlier today “to get out
misinformation about the contract fight.” He thought they were trying to
use SoCal Boeing workers as pawns to pressure Boeing workers “up
north” to settle on the bosses’ terms.
One guy took a bunch of leaflets to
distribute in the plant — “I’m on the inside!” he said.
Later he came out to say, “I’ve hooked you up!”
A Summer Project volunteer introduced
CHALLENGE to another worker as “a communist paper” and he took it
eagerly. This led to a long conversation about racism, exploitation and fighting
back. The volunteer then asked, “Do you have a friend who thinks like you
do, who might also like a paper?” When the worker said he had, the
volunteer asked, “How many friends like that do you have?” The
worker took five papers and gave her contact information to stay in touch with
the Party.
Conversations were difficult because many
workers were in cars and also because — as one volunteer noted —
“these people looked more tired than anyone I’ve ever seen come out
of work.” Almost nobody was hostile or even unfriendly. A student
leafleting for the first time at such a plant, felt it was “good
practice” but also said a discussion of the leaflet before-hand would have
better prepared us for conversations.
This was a modest, very inspiring example of
how PLP can unite workers around our newspaper and our Party. Through the
leaflet and the work of the Summer Project, SoCal Boeing workers now have a
connection to Boeing workers in Seattle.
We’ll try to strengthen this connection
by continuing to come to Boeing, following up our contacts, making more contacts
and building ties with the anti-capitalist workers who are reading our
literature. We’ll try to win some to join PLP and build it “on the
inside.”
Attack Hacks’
‘Anti-War’ Hypocrisy at AFT Convention
CHICAGO, July 15 — A growing anti-war
sentiment filled the ranks of the 3,000 delegates to the biennial American
Federation of Teachers (AFT) Convention here. However, the union mis-leadership,
which pretends to be “anti-war” and has backed anti-war resolutions,
undermines any member attempts to organize against the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan, much less the capitalist system which causes them.
The AFT Executive Council presented a
resolution to make the “spread of democracy and human rights in the world
a major tenet of American foreign policy.” It urges the AFT to
“increase funding for programs to assist pro-democracy organizations,
political parties and workers organizations that are struggling in opposition to
repressive regimes.”
A delegate countered that the U.S. has a
sordid history of promoting U.S. corporate interests in the name of
“democracy and human rights” while supporting repression of workers
and student movements in countries allied to the U.S. A second delegate
explained how the U.S. CIA had overthrown the Mossadegh government in Iran when
it nationalized its oil, and in the 1980’s had encouraged and assisted
Saddam Hussein to attack Iran resulting in a seven-year war where over one
million died.
A major goal of outgoing AFT Pres. McElhenny
and incoming Pres. Weingarten is continuing to lead union members into the arms
of the Democratic Party.
Hillary Clinton was an invited speaker and
Barack Obama spoke later via a satellite hook-up. PLP’ers distributed
hundreds of CHALLENGES and issued three Party leaflets. We explained that both
the Democrats and Republicans represented parties of capitalism and imperialist
war. Another leaflet analyzed the role of the public schools under capitalism
and exposed the so-called school reform plans that various sections of the
ruling class are advocating.
Our literature was well-received by the
delegates. We had many productive discussions with members of our delegations as
well as with new contacts from other locals. These kinds of ties are important
and we’ll make a serious plan to follow them up.
One of the convention’s bright spots
was the development of the AFT Peace and Justice Caucus. The Caucus broadened
its discussions to include school-based issues as well as anti-war issues. In
four programs rank-and-filers gave presentations about the problems in their
schools and the fight-backs over them. Anti-racist and internationalist
sentiments were strongly expressed.
The Caucus has good potential but contains
major contradictions. At organizational meetings some felt the AFT leadership
can be “worked with” and even “pushed to the left” by
progressive rank-and-file forces. But opponents of that view, including
PLP’ers, see AFT “leaders” like Weingarten as firmly in the
bosses’ camp. These “leaders” are staunch anti-communists and
supporters of U.S. imperialism. In fact, in her inaugural address Weingarten
said that sometimes when she doesn’t know what to do, she thinks,
“What would Al say,” referring to Albert Shanker, former long-time
president of the UFT and AFT.
PLP’ers remember well Shanker’s
support of the U.S. rulers’ imperialist invasion of Vietnam and his
organizing racist boycotts against parent involvement in NYC public
schools.
(Next issue: From Shanker to Weingarten
— Supporting U.S. imperialism.)
In Opposing
Imperialist War:
GI’s
Must Fight Racism, Sexism
In late August, Veterans for Peace (VFP) and
Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) will have their national conventions with
military families participating. These groups’ leaders put their hopes on
politicians to end the war in Iraq. But all politicians represent the interests
of capitalism — profit wars, racism, and sexism. The Progressive Labor
Party is organizing to fight the ruler’s agenda, not with false hopes of
change from elections, but by building an international communist movement to
smash imperialism and its racist, sexist warmakers.
While some activists honestly feel fighting
racism is a distraction to the goal of ending the war, anti-racist unity helped
anti-war troops contribute to the collapse of U.S. ground forces in Vietnam. A
majority of Vietnam-era GI rebellions centered on fighting the racism against
black and Latin soldiers along with fighting against the war. Fighting the
military’s anti-Asian racism was also vital to building solidarity with
“the enemy” which led to US troops fragging — killing —
gung ho patriotic officers, rather than killing and dying for U.S.
imperialism.
Today, fighting racism is still crucial to
fighting imperialism. Limiting the argument to the Iraqi War being bad because
U.S. troops are being killed supports U.S. rulers’ racist agenda of having
troops see Asian, Arab, and Muslim workers as subhuman. The wars, in both
Afghanistan and Iraq, are wrong because they’re killing our class brothers
and sisters, not just U.S. troops. Liberal “anti-war” politicians,
like the 13 congressional democrats who wrote a support statement to anti-Iraq
war troops, condone the racist anti-Muslim lies and support the U.S. war in
Afghanistan.
Even though many in the U.S. military
honestly believe in the ideas of national honor and pride in the US
constitution, the history of US ruler’s racist terror — from slavery
and the Indian wars to recent police murders, raids against immigrant workers,
and the murder of millions in Iraq and many thousands in
Afghanistan—contradicts these “patriotic” ideals and proves
they are a lie. But instead of winning and developing anti-racist activists
through education and action, some IVAW leaders want to appeal to a patriotism
that makes unity with the ruler’s politicians more important than unity
with workers worldwide.
Many anti-racists aren’t duped. Black
youth are resisting enlistment and black troops are opting for support jobs in
part because of the memory of Vietnam-era racism, which led to disproportionate
higher casualties among black and Latin soldiers.
Within IVAW, members have raised and led
fights against the racist nature of imperialism. But some IVAW leaders say they
don’t want to alienate “middle America” by talking about
racism. The leadership dropped a planned panel on “racism within the
military” during the group’s Winter Soldier testimonies.
IVAW’s active membership, like other military peace groups, remains mostly
white. This poses no problems, however, if you want to capture the spotlight of
the racist media and reach racist politicians, instead of building a
multi-racial movement to fight imperialism.
Like racism, sexism aids imperialism.
Capitalists win male troops to kill and die for profits using a sexist macho
warrior role. The U.S. military’s tolerance of sexism within the ranks
leads male troops to direct anger and lack of control over deployments into
seeing female troops as “walking mattresses” or sexually attacking
fellow troops instead of the bosses. Sexism within IVAW led, in part, to the
formation of the Service Women’s Action Network, a liberal feminist
veterans organization. Uniting working-class men and women to fight sexism is
among PLP goals.
The unity of multi-racial male and female
working-class troops against the military’s racism and sexism will lead to
a stronger movement that can land a powerful blow to imperialism and recruit to
PLP.
Caption to Picture:
NYC, August 8 — Relatives and friends
of Juan Alcantara, a GI killed iin Iraq a year ago, marched in Upper Manhattan
today. Alcantara was an Immigrant from Dominican Republic raised In Upper
Manhattan. Like many immigrant and other working class youth, he joined the
military to escape the "economic draft" (lack of decent jobs in civilian life).
His mother and relatives blame the Bush gang and the oil war for his death..
All Workers Must
Oppose Anti-Immigrant Racism
NEWARK, NJ, August 3 — A multi-racial
and international group of 32 people met here today to discuss the fight against
anti-immigrant racism. The unity of black and white citizens and immigrant
workers (from Ecuador, Peru, Guatemala and El Salvador) is the best way to
confront this growing form of racism which affects the entire working
class.
An immigrant described the police harassment
of day laborers waiting for jobs in an area of Orange, NJ, as “muy
malo” (very bad). Elsewhere in New Jersey, homes have been raided and
immigrants dropping off their children at school have been issued multiple
traffic tickets up to $5,000! This summer two town councils proposed that
landlords rent only to people with documentation.
One town, Bound Brook, has since dropped the
resolution. The other, Middletown, has tabled it. But with hundreds arrested at
factories lately and the racist murder of Luis Ramirez in Shenandoah, PA, by six
white youth, we felt the urgency to meet and decide on action.
We noted that criminal bosses aren’t
arrested for paying dirt wages and physically abusing workers. Because
capitalism is based on exploitation of workers, this kind of racist
super-exploitation is “legal.” The racist media tries to divide us
by blaming the victims — undocumented immigrants — for the
bosses’ attacks through the subprime crisis, mass wage and service cuts,
and endless wars. Immigrants have historically been the targets of this
ruling-class strategy. One woman recalled that her Italian father, who had no
documents, suffered similar racist attacks.
In the early stage of the bosses’
“War on Terror” in Dec. 2001, when Middletown teachers struck, the
media labeled them “the enemy of children and parents” because
“educators’ benefits must be sacrificed” for the bosses’
war efforts; 228 strikers were arrested.
A woman speaker asked us to picture a world
without borders based on a society without social inequalities: communism.
During the discussion, one man reading CHALLENGE commented, “This paper is
very important.”
A social worker from a family-help center
said we need to reach out to communities. Members from three churches spoke,
too. One Unitarian related what she learned at her June General Assembly: that
Boston and Connecticut churches have e-mail chains ready to respond to
attacks.
If the tabled anti-immigrant proposal
isn’t rejected in Middletown, we plan to go door to door to relate what
long-time residents have in common with immigrants and look to demonstrate
wherever a resolution is passed.
PL Youths’ Red
Ideas Greeted
At
International Festival
ATHENS, GREECE, July 30 — Seven PLP
youth representing our international party participated in the Resistance 2008
Festival, a worldwide gathering of thousands of young students and workers,
hosted by the fake leftist Communist Organization of Greece (KOE). Our young
comrades gained much experience in fighting for PL’s revolutionary
communist politics internationally — helping develop new political
leadership for PLP. We also fulfilled our aim of making many contacts among
workers locally and from elsewhere, all seriously interested in our Party. These
comrades come from different areas and work backgrounds. Some have been in PLP
for a long time while others joined the Party within the last few
years.
We distributed hundreds of CHALLENGES and
several thousand special supplements, as well as hundreds of PLP’s
document “Road to Revolution 4” and recent issues of the Communist
Magazine. While there were many fake leftist groups present, most of the
participants were young Greek students and workers. While unable to speak Greek,
we managed to advance our ideas among many of them.
We hit the ground running to spread our
ideas. Our tables displaying all our literature and banners was one of the most
popular. We worked nonstop talking to new people and always had a group of
people hanging out and chatting!
We fought for international working-class
unity against nationalism, explaining that nationalism builds false loyalties to
capitalists instead of being loyal to the working class across all borders. It
is another tool, like racism, to divide the world’s workers. We were also
the only group to advocate the dictatorship of the proletariat. This put us at
odds with the festival, which supported the Maoists in Nepal and their leader
“Prachanda” who is fighting for unity with local capitalists. Almost
everyone we spoke with was interested in our ideas, even if they
disagreed.
At our scheduled panel discussion on the
final day, the seats were full; chairs were added three times for the overflow
audience. After a KOE member spent 20 minutes criticizing our ideas on
nationalism, a comrade drew applause with a powerful response that used the
history of what nationalism produced in Africa and elsewhere, saying Nepal is
currently following that path. We also explained why we fight directly for
communism since socialism retained too many remnants of capitalism (like the
wage system) and led to the return of open capitalism in the former Soviet bloc
and China.
We adapted to the fact that most people
didn’t speak English and that parts of the festival were dedicated to
non-political events like rock concerts. So each night we distributed our
literature to the concert-goers. At one point, the hundreds gathered were all
reading CHALLENGE, not even paying attention to the band!
We were also fortunate in meeting a young
Greek airport worker moments after landing. She took a day off to accompany us
to the festival, translated our literature and banners into Greek and helped
explain our ideas to those Greeks who didn’t speak English. She is very
supportive of the Party and is being struggled with to join us and help build
PLP in Greece.
Racism was much more prevalent in Greece and
Western Europe than we expected. Our nonwhite comrades were constantly
ID’d while whites weren’t. One comrade was ID’d three times by
three different cops within about three minutes, while they searched for
“illegal” immigrants. On the trains the police challenged the
comrade’s passport for “authenticity.”
In one southern Italian city, swastikas and
Nazi propaganda were plastered all over the walls. In Paris, we encountered and
supported a strike of immigrant workers who were demonstrating right across from
the Champs-Elysees, the main tourist drag. We tried speaking for a while in our
broken French and bought them all lunch.
Our trip has built confidence in ourselves
and in each other, trusting the collective and carrying out decisions in a
disciplined way (both personally and politically) as well for each comrade to
make decisions consistent with our goals when they were on their own and under
various pressures. We internationalized our perspective of the working class.
Almost all of us made separate groups of friends with whom we plan to stay in
touch and collectively recruit to the Party
While the U.S. ruling class is making
long-term investments in Obama and building new weapons of war, we made a
long-term investment in our movement, by solidifying young comrades and laying
the groundwork for the growth of PLP.
South Africa General
Strike
Shows Power of
Workers
PRETORIA, SOUTH AFRICA, Aug. 6 — A
massive general strike shut down this country’s economy today as tens of
thousands of workers marched against rising fuel and food prices. Today’s
nationwide strike, which followed several regional ones, was called by the
Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU), under pressure from nearly two
million members.
The Mail and Guardian (8/7) said, “The
South African Clothing and Textile Workers’ Union...reported that 93% of
its members had not gone to work....Gold mining operations...were affected
substantially, with AngloGold Ashanti saying no shafts were operating while
Harmony and Gold Fields said its operations were limited.
Volkswagen’s...factory in Uitenhage...halted production, and Toyota South
Africa closed its Durban plant for the day, as did Mercedes-Benz...in East
London. Many...schools had been closed...”
Masses marched in many cities. In Pretoria,
thousands marched to the Union Buildings, giving a memorandum of grievance
against soaring electricity prices to Labor Minister Membathisi Mdladlana. Some
6,000 workers marched in East London, while about 5,000 took to the streets in
Mthatha. The closure of Mercedes-Benz’s East London plant and other
automotive factories in the province had the most obvious impact on the Eastern
Cape economy.
This massive strike again showed the power
workers have to shut down any modern economy. It is the road workers and their
allies worldwide must follow to fight the bosses’ growing attacks in this
age of economic meltdown and wars. Such an action is also one way to counter the
recent racist pogrom fueled by lies blaming immigrant workers from Zimbawe,
Mozambique, and elsewhere for the rise in prices and lack of jobs for
all.
But much more is needed. The plight of
workers won’t be solved by changing one politician or union misleader for
another. For many years the COSATU leadership supported the African National
Congress (ANC) government led by Mbeki and whose IMF-imposed austerity measures
worsened workers’ lives here. COSATU, along with its allies in the
“Communist” Party, which also supported Mbeki, are now backing the
presidency of Jacob Zuma, who until 2005 was one of Mbeki’s deputy
vice-presidents.
Zuma supported the privatization of Eskom,
the government-owned electric utility. The recent electricity price rises are
supposed to help Eskom, whose failing system has caused blackouts affecting
capitalist operations like the gold mines. Privatization didn’t go through
because investors realized that Eskom’s current sad state won’t be
profitable.
The power struggle between different factions
of the ruling ANC for control of state power, and the fruits of their being the
main servants of local and international capitalists, again show that
workers’ fight-back cannot limit itself to backing one set of bosses (such
as African nationalists like the ANC) as the past militant anti-apartheid
struggle did.
Many workers and youth in South Africa
consider themselves pro-communist and revolutionary, but they must realize that
the ANC-“C”P-COSATU leaders are far from that. The best lesson to
draw from general strikes like today’s is to turn them into schools for
communism, and rebuild a red-led workers movement. But this time it must break
with all capitalists and fight for the only society capable of freeing workers
from capitalism and its racism — communism.
LETTERS
More Letters from LA
Summer Project
We’ve participated as students and
teachers in the Los Angeles Summer Project, leafleting factories where many
workers ask us, “Why are you communists? Why fight for this if you are
students?” We answer them by talking about the power they have as a
working class to stop the means of production. That sparks workers’
interest in our ideas. They say, “Yes, the bosses steal from them, and
that we have to eliminate this system of exploitation.”
We’ve also participated in anti-racist
demonstrations and others protesting exploitation of workers. Many workers came
up to us asking for literature, then read it, triggering conversations.
In study groups we’ve learned to relate
dialectical materialism to our lives, about how to build CHALLENGE networks, and
how to win people so that together we can fight for communism. In discussing
political economy we’ve heard comrades’ stories about bosses’
repression existing in many countries.
I’ve recognized the importance of
working in factories and building an alliance among workers, students and
soldiers. This Project has motivated me even more to continue fighting for
communism together with the international working class.
A youth from El Salvador
I’m an industrial student volunteering
for the Summer Project. After job searching that took about a week I got my
first job as an assistant forger, which is pressing and heating metal. On my
second day of work, I had my first chance to have a political conversation with
a co-worker, that went something like this:
“So, how do you feel about making
weapons for war?” I asked a young co-worker.
He said, “I don’t care, as long
as we make some money off of it...Why? Were you in the army?”
“No,” I responded, “I just
hate the war; we’re helping the government kill poor people like us, and
for what, oil?”
“Well I’m not for the war
either!” he said. “But what can we do?”
“Exactly, what could we
do?”
He stayed quiet and we went back to
work.
Although he didn’t respond to this
question, this conversation shows my attempt at figuring out the internal
contradictions of my co-workers.
This was just the first conversation of many
where I will attempt to figure out how to reveal to my fellow workers the true
nature of this racist imperialist system and how to build an urgent and
long-term fight against it.
Industrial student
What a great morning! It was our first time
–– for the six volunteers from my city –– at an
aerospace factory.
The first worker I spoke with was somewhat
hesistant. He refused CHALLENGE and the flyer. He said he likes equality and the
goals of communism but feels that it’s too risky to stand up against the
bosses, that it puts a worker’s family into too much danger, and that
things didn’t turn out well in the Soviet Union. He didn’t want
anyone to see him with the paper.
Shortly, a bolder worker approached. I
offered CHALLENGE, saying that our communist newspaper explains how Obama is no
better than McCain, that both really support ongoing war in the Middle East to
benefit the oil companies. He agreed and explained that they’re just like
Bush and Cheney. Then he pointed to the factory, saying, “yeah, just like
the bosses here, just out for themselves.” After taking CHALLENGE, he
said, “Good luck.”
When I introduced the paper to a group of
three workers, one asked, “Why are you here in particular?” I
explained that we want to organize and fight against the low wages in the
non-union aerospace factories where work is contracted out from the major
companies like Boeing. At some point, the aerospace workers have to be prepared
to stop work and refuse to make parts for the bosses’ wars. I compared the
situation in aerospace to something similar during the Civil War.
Prior to the Civil War, cotton from the South
was being sent to England to be made into cloth. But many of the English
textile workers hated slavery and refused to process cotton from the U.S. They
wanted to help weaken the Confederacy and support the fight against slavery,
even though some of them would probably end up losing their jobs.
One of the three workers said
“Excellent!” He told me that he agrees with communism, and gets
mailings from another (supposedly) Marxist organization. With warm comradely
enthusiasm, we exchanged phone numbers, so we can get together and talk more
about Progressive Labor Party.
At another moment, a boss from the factory
came out and shouted, “Stay off the property!” I told him that I had
just stepped across the grass for a few workers who wanted the flyer. He
responded arrogantly, “No one wants the flyer!” and I shot back,
“You can’t speak for everyone!” Obviously unable to stop us,
and unable to stop workers from understanding reality, he just repeated,
“Well, stay off the property,” and he walked back in.
All in all, at this one small factory, 70
workers took CHALLENGE this morning.
Facts are stubborn things. The bosses will
try their best to keep us ignorant, but millions of workers will master
political theory, communist philosophy and revolutionary strategy. Today was a
small, but important step in that process. What a great Summer
Project!
Original R
Rising Struggle Among
Young Workers
I was recently reprimanded at work for using
my cell phone next to the vending machine during a break. The head boss, who
spends most of his time in an air-conditioned office while us workers sweat away
on the job, was the one who screamed at me. Though several of my co-workers
assured me that it was nothing to worry about, the words of another worker stuck
in my head.
That morning during the carpool to work, when
I asked this coworker how he thought we’d be affected by the other layoffs
in our industry he reasoned, “Well that’s why they’re trying
to fire people over bullshit and they are using the early buyout program on
older workers at the top of the wage-scale.” The new workers they’re
bringing in are supposedly “temporary” and receive no benefits or
wage increases like us other workers.
I told another worker that I felt like I had
a target on my back ever since I was called into the head boss’s office a
short time ago for attending an anti-racist demonstration before work. Going to
such a rally in uniform was a “fire-able offence [sic]” he said and,
“he didn’t know what was going to happen to me.” While the
head boss told me to keep the incident to myself I decided that if I was going
to get fired for fighting racism, as many of my coworkers ought to know about it
as possible. Lots of workers took my side and several seemed impressed that I, a
white worker, would attend a rally against police brutality. One worker felt it
was a clear expression of the racism often present on the job.
I discussed with my coworker who I’d
told about the target on my back the possibility of a union making conditions
better. He, also a young worker, was quick to point out the corruption and
profiteering present in many unions and cited a previous job where the union did
nothing to defend low seniority workers. The failures of the reformist trade
union movement and the past communist movement make the path ahead a difficult
one, but this same worker helped provide some direction.
At the end of our shift we were assigned
extra work. This worker went to the main office, complained and sat down
refusing to work. Several minutes later he rejoined me and another worker who
were carrying out the task, since he felt bad for leaving us to do the work
alone. As we walked back to the car afterwards he explained what he had done and
I told him that the next time he had better include me in any plans to stop
work. “I’m down!” We questioned if any boss could not play
favorites and I reasoned, “it’s just good cop, bad cop; the whole
system is rotten.”
I believe firmly in the PLP’s objective
of organizing industrial workers. We make this society run and we can shut it
down. I look forward to expanding my CHALLENGE distribution on this job and the
next and struggling towards a new, communist society.
A Young Worker
Strikes Under
Communism?
In a discussion with a long-time Party
comrade about toleration or repression of dissent in a genuine communist
society, the question arose: what is dissent? I would emphasize that
fascists, racists, pro-capitalist elements, etc. would not be considered as
dissidents and the workers’ state would have to act accordingly. But what
about a group of workers protesting a certain government policy and want to
present a position paper on the question? Assuming that all of the workers
are devoted communists and may have a good point, I think they should be allowed
to voice their opinion and have the right to publish their views, even if it
disagrees with the majority.
What about strikes? Should workers have the
right to strike in a communist society? The comrade said strikes would not be
legal in this society, and though I can see where he’s coming from,
I’m not sure that I agree with that position.
If communism is really based upon
workers’ power, then workers should have the right to voice their views on
this question. Otherwise it would seem that this would be imposed from above and
would only alienate segments of the workers.
Of course, my view on this stems from the
fact that I grew up in the coal fields and that some of my family worked in the
mines. The right to strike was and is very important to coal miners. I cannot
see them giving up the right to strike when they feel that it is necessary,
especially around job safety.
The fact that strikes are illegal won’t
prevent workers from striking if they feel the need to do so. Of course, not all
strikes are the same; some might be clearly reactionary and would have to be
dealt with. But some strikes might be progressive so the workers’ state
would have to investigate the workers’ reasons for striking and make the
necessary changes.
A person might argue that in a communist
society there will be no need for strikes, but if this is true, then why have
laws against them?
I think there should be an attempt by the
workers’ state to explain to workers why it’s not a good idea to
strike. The question of communist consciousness will need to be resolved. But I
don’t think it’s a good idea to pass a law banning strikes —
this would be an admission that everything is not going well.
Again, I don’t like the idea of
imposing this position on the workers, as if they were unruly children and would
strike every chance they got.
Shouldn’t we have more faith in the
workers? Shouldn’t we have more confidence in the power of our communist
ideas?
Red Coal
Red Eye on the News
Plenty of big-biz $
backs Obama
In an effort to cast himself as independent
of the influence of money on politics, Senator Barack Obama often highlights the
campaign contributions of $200 or less....But records show that one-third of his
record-breaking haul has come from donations of $1,000 or more: a total of $112
million, more than Senator John McCain....
Many...come from industries with critical
interests in Washington. (NYT, 8/6)
Russia war is payback to
US
Even as American and European leaders were
demanding, begging and pleading with Russia to halt its advance into
Georgia....Many experts in foreign policy say that one reason Russia responded
so forcefully to Georgia’s attempt to take back South Ossetia is that the
United States and Europe had been asserting themselves in Russia’s
backyard, alienating Moscow by supporting Kosovo’s bid for
independence.
Beyond that, Russia has also been angry about
American plans to put a missile defense system in Poland, and by American moves
to encourage Georgia and Ukraine to join NATO....
“It’s
difficult for them not to see us as
hostile....”
(NYT, 8/12)
Nuke-free area (except
Israel)
The security council’s offer to Iran
claimed...to bring about a “Middle East free of weapons of mass
destruction.” But like every other such document, it made no mention of
the principal owner of weapons in the region: Israel. According to a leaked
briefing by the US Defence Intelligence Agency, Israel possesses between 60 and
80 nuclear bombs. But none of the countries demanding that Iran scraps the
weapons it doesn’t yet possess are demanding that Israel destroy the
weapons it has....
If Iran builds a bomb, it will do so for one
reason: that there is already a nuclear-armed state in the Middle East, by which
it feels threatened. (GW, 8/1)
Obama wants you to serve
US
....While McCain has made only vague pledges
to support AmeriCorps, Obama last week used a speech in Colorado Springs to
highlight his pledge to spend $3.5 billion to bolster AmeriCorps, the Peace
Corps, the Foreign Service, and launch an Energy Corps....
“I’m not going to tell you what
your role should be....But I am going to ask you to play your part, ask you to
stand up; ask you to put your foot firmly into the current of history”.
(NYT)
Desperate Haitians
eating dirt
Haitian women mould clay and water into
hundreds of little platters and lay them out to harden in the sun....These
platters are not to hold food. They are food....
....The cakes have become a staple for entire
families. It is not for the taste and nutrition –– salt and
margarine do not disguise what is essentially dirt....They are the cheapest and
increasingly only way to fill bellies.
“It stops the hunger,” said
Marie-Carmelle Baptiste, 35, a producer....She did not embroider their appeal.
“You eat them when you have to. (GW, 8/8)
Anti-Latino hate crimes
up
FBI figures show a 35% rise in hate crime
against Latinos over the past three years....“Post 9/11 we immediately
launched into a nativist attitude. Then as the economy began to falter,
attitudes have hardened.”
The federal government is doing its
bit....
The message being propagated by Congress, the
White House, local legislators and the more rabid elements of the media seems to
be getting through: “illegal” immigrants are of little value, and
should be treated accordingly. (GW, 8/8)
‘Honest
Abe’ Lincoln Was Viciously Pro-Slavery
Lerone Bennett, Jr.’s book,
“Forced Into Glory” (1999), convincingly documents how most
historical accounts have wrongly described Abraham Lincoln as a fighter against
slavery. His work also shows that Lincoln was intensely reactionary, making
decisions which, contrary to legend, returned many blacks to slavery.
Bennett insists that Lincoln had a life-long
commitment to racism. In 1853, as one of 11 managers of the Illinois State
Colonization Society, he advocated colonization of all blacks to Central or
South America. In 1857 he urged the Illinois legislature to appropriate money
for colonization. Three months after signing the Emancipation Proclamation, he
sent 450 blacks to an island off the coast of Haiti where 100 died within a
year. In April 1865, Lincoln summoned General Benjamin Butler to the White House
about the “possibility of sending the Blacks away.”
Bennett documents consistency, from
Lincoln’s 1836 vote against black suffrage to his 1865 support of the
Louisiana constitution which gave the vote to Confederate veterans but not to
black veterans of the U.S. Army.
In 1847, as an attorney representing a
slave-owner, he asked two judges to send a black mother and her four children
back into slavery. The white judges rejected Lincoln’s plea and freed the
family. Lincoln’s law partner, William Herendon, took cases of slaves, but
Lincoln never did.
Bennett challenges those who excuse
Lincoln’s attitude, saying the few exceptions in the racist climate of the
19th century are out-spoken abolitionists like Wendell Phillips or the militant
John Brown. But men like Lyman Trumbull, a known opponent of the pro-slavery
Kansas-Nebraska Act, were elected to the Senate over Lincoln. In 1853, 22
Illinois legislators stood against the Negro Exclusion Law, but not Lincoln.
Members of Lincoln’s cabinet spoke out for Negro suffrage. Politicians
from Mid-West states led the fight against Negro exclusion and black laws. Other
politicians took stands for instant emancipation, confiscation of rebels’
land and for use of black soldiers.
Bennett critiques the Gettysburg Address for
avoiding pressing issues of the day. The lynchings and burnings of blacks in NYC
that very year weren’t mentioned. Lincoln never uttered the words
Confederate, South or slave.
Bennett describes how each of three drafts of
Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation reacted to a more progressive
Congress. Congressman Daniel Gott called for a ban on the slave trade in the
nation’s capital. Lincoln then wrote his first draft, a bill for gradual
and compensated emancipation in D.C., stating that all persons now within said
District lawfully held as slaves should remain such.
In September 1861, Lincoln revoked General
Fremont’s blanket emancipation of all the slaves in Missouri. Intense
criticism caused him to write his second “emancipation” draft,
proposing gradual emancipation but total compensation for slave-owners in
Delaware, with two timetables for ending slavery: 1893 and 1914!
In 1862, when General Hunter decreed that all
slaves in South Carolina, Georgia and Florida should be freed, Lincoln revoked
it, re-enslaving one million people! Criticism was again levied at Lincoln, so
Congress urgently signed the Second Confiscation Act saying that all rebel
property, including slaves even 1,000 miles from a battlefield, could be seized.
Lincoln countered on July 22, allowing 60 days warning for the South, and only
for gradual, compensated confiscation.
That July, Congress also authorized the use
of black soldiers. Lincoln told a delegation of Midwesterners in August that he
would rather resign than use black soldiers to kill white men.
Ultimately, the Proclamation “enslaved
and/or continued to enslave over half a million slaves, more than it ever
freed,” because there was no power to effectively free slaves in rebel
states. The border states, with an additional 556,540 slaves, were excluded
because they weren’t in rebellion. Also excluded were large sections of
Tennessee, Louisiana and Virginia controlled by federal troops — 396,863
slaves — some already wage workers. In January, 1863, slaves totaled four
million. By February 1865, two months before the war ended, 3,800,000 blacks
were still enslaved.
What did Lincoln do on race issues? He
volunteered three times for the war to ethnically cleanse Illinois of Indians.
He maintained the brutal treatment of black soldiers and their unequal pay. When
William Walker, a black soldier, protested, Lincoln condemned him to the firing
squad. He made sure 38 Indians hung for rebelling against his
administration’s genocidal strategy. But when Confederates massacred
hundreds of blacks, women and children at Fort Pillow, Lincoln did nothing.
Bennett’s work is well-researched and
relentlessly exposes Lincoln’s reactionary policies. He also directs sharp
criticism at modern biographers for perpetuating the racist hypocrisy of
Lincoln’s heroic image as “the freer of slaves.”
SUMMER OF
COMMUNISM
LETTERS
FROM LOS ANGELES
For several days I’ve been immersed in
the Los Angeles Summer Project, part of multi-racial teams rising early to
distribute thousands of CHALLENGES and leaflets at aerospace plants, garment
factories, bus barns, high schools and a trade school. The response has been
terrific. We debrief daily on workers’ responses to our ideas and our
conversations with them. Many contacts have been collected, and follow-up visits
are held regularly.
I discussed with one young student at a trade
school (which feeds into the aerospace industry) how communism would be
completely different from the way things are set up under capitalism. Everyone
would work out of commitment to the welfare of the working class, and people
would receive according to need. He asked what about someone who wouldn’t
want to work. I said this wouldn’t be much of a problem. Most people want
to contribute to society and get the good feeling from helping others (which has
motivated about a million people to go to New Orleans as volunteers, helping
with reconstruction after Hurricane Katrina). He said he would read CHALLENGE
carefully.
This is one of many worthy experiences
I’ve had in building the Party this week. Long live PLP and the fight for
communism!
A Comrade
“What you are talking about, communism,
I think it sounds good but do you really think it can happen, I mean what makes
you think it’s possible?” asked a young white Marine after him and
his partner were presented with a GI Notes military newsletter and a CHALLENGE.
“I’ll tell you what makes me
think it’s possible,” responded one of the volunteers.
“It’s because of the tremendous potential power that we have. You
and military folks just like yourself run things, the brass and other top
military officials don’t do shit. They can’t do anything without us.
You are on the ground and you make things happen. Same thing in the factories,
the workers run them and make all the production. This is where our tremendous
power lies. Imagine soldiers and workers fighting together for a world in which
we make revolution against the war-makers and the whole bosses’ system.
“This has happened in the past.There
was a worldwide crisis of capitalism that eventually led to World War I. During
this time period millions of soldiers rebelled, mutinied and organized
resistance while workers struck, led mass protests and organized general
fight-backs. With Lenin’s and other Bolsheviks’ communist
leadership...in Russia a revolution took place and for the first time in history
the working class was running things. The same took place in China, with Mao and
other communist leaders during and after World War II.
We think that with the situation in Iraq and
the growing imperialist rivalry going on with Russia, China and the U.S. could
very well develop into a global conflict that will ultimately start a World War
III. This is one more reason why individuals like yourself are very important
because once we understand the tremendous power that soldiers and workers have
we can once again challenge the world’s rulers and finish the job that
these great revolutionaries started.
The young Marine had an intent look on his
face and with CHALLENGE in his hand said, “Wow, I had never really thought
about it that way, I really can see what you are saying, but I think that since
we have been children we have been taught different ideas of things. I think
it’s going to be very difficult,” he said. “Difficult yes, but
not impossible,” I responded. “Yeah, I agree,” he said. As we
said goodbye, the Marine gave us his contact information and said, in an
encouraging and heartfelt manner, “good luck, keep it up and I wish you
the best.”
Summer Project Volunteer
“You should go across the street and
distribute the papers to the workers at that factory too because they are really
exploited there,” said a worker we talked to today. This took place at
one of the many CHALLENGE sales outside of factories as part of the PLP Summer
Project. This particular worker is a machinist at a small subcontracted factory
of Boeing/ Northrop Grumman. Part of his job is making the skeleton for
military planes.
This worker had trouble making the connection
to his own exploitation because he felt that he was skilled and that he was
making enough money. However, he clearly saw how the planes he makes are sold
for millions and how these companies profit from his labor. He had heard that
the factory across the street was notorious for pushing their workers hard for
very low wages. He advised us on the best times to reach the workers during
their shift, he was aware of the multitude of workers who have to struggle
everyday to survive.
He considers himself lucky to be making
$100,000 a year, but as we continued to talk with him, we were able to show how
he was exploited too. He works 65 hours a week, 6 days a week and is constantly
under pressure to work faster. In fact, recently his boss held a meeting in
which he told the workers that if they didn’t produce faster, the bosses
would have to let people go. We related this speed up and fear tactics to
police brutality, the war and cut backs in healthcare.
We told him about an unarmed Latino man named
Christian Portillo who was shot recently by the police, as well as Kevin Wicks
who was also killed by them. The worker then told us about how he is constantly
profiled. He was even pulled out of his car at gun point while wearing his work
uniform. This reveals the racism that many Latino and black workers face. He
has gotten used to being pulled over and considers it just a part of life. As
we talked more about police brutality it became clearer and clearer to the
worker that these scare tactics are not only used by the police but also by his
factory bosses as well.
Then we talked about the cutbacks in health
care, and he told us a story about his wife.
She was so sick that he had take off from
work to take care of her around the clock for a year. This resulted in their
losing their home and getting into debt.
He understood on a very personal level that
workers are only a few paychecks away from ending up homeless and in debt. This
was helpful in revealing the myth that a middle class exists, because there are
workers who live more comfortably but they do not own the means of production.
They are exploited. We hope to go back to this factory and find this worker and
ask what he thought of Challenge.
A project volunteer
Besides the daily political work at the Los Angeles
Summer Project, we also laugh, love and even cry. Here is what the international
communist PLP family produces.
After a day of political activities, I gave a
presentation to a group of local and international volunteers about how I joined
PLP and described the Party’s work in my area of Mexico. I didn’t
know many of the volunteers I was speaking to, but I know that despite our
different backgrounds we have much more in common. So once we were all together
as a communist family, in spite of our superficial differences, my heart was
beating faster. “Was this because I was nervous, or
happy?”
Happiness is something you want and need. I feel proud
and that is happiness.
I feel I love my comrades — but why? Because my
heart beats faster for my class, my life and my communist Party. I am PLP, I am
a communist.
A Communist Youth from Mexico